Accidents involving pets or animals won’t attract rash driving clause, says Karnataka HC - The News Minute
The case pertains to an accident in 2018, when the petitioner Prathap Kumar hit a pet dog being taken out for a walk by a 60-year-old woman in a residential area. In a recent judgment, the Karnataka High Court held that the provision of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Motor Vehicles Act would be applicable for injuries caused to pets or animals during road accidents. In particular, the court ruled that the provision under section 279 of the Indian Penal Code for rash driving was applicable only to human beings and not to a pet or an animal. Justice Suraj Govindaraj, on October 21, passed the judgment while hearing a petition filed by a 21-year-old, seeking to quash the proceedings against him in which he had been accused of causing the death of a pet dog. Justice Govindaraj also ruled that charges imposed under section 279 of IPC would not be attracted as the section did not recognise and/or make an offence any injury caused to animals. "An accident involving...